Takeaways from the Southern California Writer’s Conference Part 1: Cross-Reading Leads to Better Metaphors

I was at the Southern California Writer’s Conference last weekend and as always came back with some valuable ideas and connections.

At author Bob Yehling’s panel on Cross-Genre Writing, Yehling urged listeners to keep a stack of four to five books around and read them at the same time to improve the reader’s ability to use figurative language. Apparently the right/left brain connections built by this method help generate metaphors, similes and analogies.

Presently I’m reading Eight Lives Down: The Most Dangerous Job in the World in the Most Dangerous Place in the World, by Chris Hunter; The Land of Nod by Mark A. Clements, The Art of Subtext by Charles Baxter, and re-reading A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin. I’ve been reading more than one book at a time for a while now, motivated by a desire to cram as much into my time as possible. I’ve noticed that figurative language has been coming to me more easily but assumed it was just due to practice. But perhaps Yehling is onto something here, and it’s my daily cross-reading instead. Has anyone else been doing this and gotten similar, or different, results?

5 Comments

Filed under Writing

2010 Condor Schedule

I will be on panels at Condor again this year. Condor is in San Diego, CA from February 26-28, 2010. Guest of Honor is CJ Cherryh. The hotel is the Handlery Hotel in Mission Valley.

My 2010 ConDor Program Schedule

Friday

Noon

Director’s Rm: Looking Back at the Aughts:  A Decade of Genre on TV – Janet Tait, Val Ontell, Chris Marie Green (M)

Saturday

11 AM

Executive Rm:  The Social Contract In Role-play Gaming – Janet Tait(M), P. J. Haarsma, Allison Lonsdale, Dani Kollin, Eytan Kollin

Sunday

2 PM

Board Rm:  Never Offline: Living in a world on constant communcation – Allison Lonsdale, Ron Oakes, Janet Tait, Karen Willson(M)

3 PM

Executive Rm:  New Ways of Watching TV: : Online, HD, DVR; How does it change what we see? – J. C. Runolfson(M), Janet Tait, Arabella Benson, Nancy Holder

I’m especially excited about the last panel. New delivery methods have already changed how we as viewers watch TV. They are also beginning to change which shows are renewed, cancelled, and greenlighted.  New models such as web-native shows have the potential of circumventing existing delivery systems (broadcast TV, cable) and creating a direct connection between the content creator and the viewer. There will be big shake-ups ahead. Interesting topic.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Conventions

(Very) Short Fiction: Writing Stories for Twitter

How do you write a story in 140 characters? It’s simple. Action, reaction, and a twist.

Start with a basic concept. And by basic, I mean really basic. The space limitations of Twitter won’t let you write War and Peace, or even an O’Henry story. But it will let you get a cute little story down if you keep it simple.

Then figure out how to tell it. What happens? Which action starts the story off? What reaction brings the point across? And what twist or ending wraps it all up? Ideally you’ll have no more than one to three sentences at this point. Then trim it down to 140 characters.

Here’s an example to illustrate these principles. The science fiction/fantasy twitter fiction magazine Thaumatrope put out a call for February-themed submissions. This got me thinking about Valentine’s Day with its associated traditions: romantic dinners, chocolates, valentine’s cards, candy hearts…hmm… what can I do with candy hearts? What if, in the future, candy hearts were laced with nanotech robots that caused the person who ate them to do the thing written on the candy? Eating a LUV ME heart would cause the person who ate it to fall in love with the person who gave them the candy heart. Sort of a high tech version of a love spell. Cool. There’s the concept, and the prompt for the action.

So who would use something like this? Well, again in the vein of keeping it simple, let’s go with a girl who wants to a guy to fall in love with her. So the action is that a girl gives a guy a LUV ME candy heart laced with nanotech robots. What’s the next step?

The next step is the reaction. What happens? We could go a couple of different ways with this. It could work, it could fail, something bad could happen, the guy could do something,,,but I decide I want it to work. In fact, I want her to feed him another, then another, until he agrees to marry her (what can I say, I’m a romantic.)

Next I need a twist. Something needs to happen that makes this a story, not just a sequence of events. A twist could mean that the technology fails, that someone interferes, that the guy finds out, or anything else turns things around and creates an ending to the story.  I decide that I want this whole plan to backfire on my heroine. Guess I’m not such a romantic after all.

Now comes the hard part: communicating all that in just 140 characters. I start with the action – feeding the guy the candy hearts, then blend in the reaction – he agrees to marry her, then cap it off with the twist – she gets fed a candy heart he leaves for her.

So this is the final version, 140 characters long,  published by Thaumatrope on Feb. 14:

“Fed my guy nano-laced candy hearts. KISS ME, LUV ME..the bots sealed the deal with MARRY ME. Yum! A blank one..uh, why did I sign a pre-nup?”

I enjoy writing these; finding a concept that works in such a restricted format and then whittling the words down to just the right ones is lots of fun. Try it yourself and see.

1 Comment

Filed under Writing