How to Survive RWA – or any Large Conference

As a veteran of RWA, and conventions much larger and crazier than RWA — Comic-Con, the Consumer Electronics Show, and the National Association of Broadcasters, to name a few—I thought I would take some time to go over a few strategies I have found helpful over the years for surviving big events.

  • Have priorities – Go into the conference knowing why you are there. Want to learn more about writing? Then focus on the craft panels. Trying to land an agent? There are plenty of opportunities to pitch, both at the agent/editor appointments, and informally, at parties and in bars. Interested in what publishers are looking for? Make their spotlights a priority. Remember that most programs are taped. You can catch up on almost all of the programs after the conference by buying the CDs.
  • Make a plan – Review the schedule of events before you get to the conference. Know which programs will not be recorded, and if those programs are important to you, plan on attending them. Choose in advance which programs interest you and download the handouts.
  • Be willing to toss the plan – No matter how interesting a program sounds on paper, it may not be what you expected once the presentation starts. Don’t be embarrassed to leave and find a program that works better for you. People enter and leave programs all the time for many reasons – appointments, breaks, etc. Do what works for you.
  • Embrace the unexpected – Sometimes the most interesting and useful things are the ones you didn’t plan: sitting in on a program by an author not in your sub-genre and learning tons about writing, that chance meeting with an agent at the bar, finding a kindred spirit in the person sitting next to you at the luncheon. Don’t be afraid to try something new or take a chance.
  • Take advantage of opportunities – Many people are not aware that some folks bail out on their agent/editor meetings (crazy, right?). If you hang around the meeting area and check in with the volunteers, you may be able to grab one of these open appointments. Prepare your list of agents/editors ahead of time and know who you want to pitch to.
  • Don’t forget to take care of yourself - Wear comfortable shoes, take frequent breaks, keep hydrated, and don’t forget to eat. Sounds like common sense, but attending to the basics is easy to forget when you are running from panel to panel.
  • Have fun - An often-neglected part of attending conferences. Find something, anything, you find fun and make sure to do it. Whether that’s meeting your favorite author, or going out to dinner with old (or new) friends, or playing tourist, doing something fun makes slogging through a long conference much more bearable.

So what are your strategies for tackling RWA? Feel free to share them below.

11 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Laura Bradford Talks About The Call, Working with Editors, and More

Agent Laura Bradford gave a talk entitled “Everything You Want to Know About Literary Agents” at the Valley Center Library in San Diego Saturday, May 14th. I posted Part One of my write-up last week. Here is Part Two: her advice on what to do once you get that all-important “call,” what questions to ask a prospective agent, and how she goes about pitching her author’s books to editors:

  • When an agent calls, ask questions. According to Ms. Bradford, it’s important for an author to learn everything they can about an agent before they sign with them. Ask about communication style (and frequency), their process, their editing style (if they edit), how they submit work to editors, if they have an agency agreement, and which editors they plan to submit to. Ask them what their expectations are of their authors.
  • While you are feeling the agent out, the agent is feeling you out. Ms. Bradford always talks to the author before making an offer—the offer is the last thing in the conversation. She wants to get a sense of who the person is first. She also wants to know that an author she’s thinking of signing is an active participant in their own career.
  • Ask for time to decide. If an agent makes an offer, she recommends the author ask for a week to decide. Take that time to do research and determine if that agent is a good fit for you. Check with other agents you are currently working with. They will pay much more attention now that you have an offer on the table. E-mail them and let them know about your offer, and give them a chance to make an offer of their own.
  • Once you get an agent, s/he gets to work pitching your book. Ms. Bradford creates a pitch list of the best editors to target. She usually can’t submit to multiple imprints at the same publishing house, which can limit the number of editors she submits to. Often she can do multiple pitch rounds, depending on the genre. She might use some of the material from the author’s query in her pitch, or she might rewrite the pitch entirely, considering another element of the book to be a better hook.
  • The pitching process varies by agent. Ms. Bradford likes to call rather than email—she uses the phone call as an opportunity to build interest in the book and bring it to the top of an editor’s pile. After eight weeks she follows up with the editors. She has no set timeline for how long it takes to sell a book – her books have  taken from 24 hours to 16 months. The average is 3 to 4 months.
  • Closing the deal. When she gets an offer, she may ask for a week to make a decision. She talks to the editors who still have the manuscript and gives them a deadline. Depending on the process of each editorial house, some can respond within that deadline, and some cannot. The decision of which publisher to go with is made by the agent and the author together, and depends on many factors, or deal points—— format, publication dates, advance, royalties, and options on the next book. She advises an author to make an option as narrow as possible. Instead of giving a publisher an option to all future books, for example, narrow the option down to something like “your next romance featuring these specific characters.”
  • The Pros and Cons of Auctions. If more than one house is interested, the agent can call an auction. According to Ms. Bradford, auctions sound more exciting than they are. They don’t necessarily mean big money. In a typical auction, the editor who wins is the person with the most money — not necessarily editor who “gets” the book and will support the author’s career. Ms. Bradford conducts a “best bid” auction — one sealed bid from each interested party. She consults with the author and they choose a winner.

I learned a lot from Ms. Bradford’s enlightening talk. I thought her point that choosing a publisher is more than a monetary decision was thought-provoking. What did you find surprising or interesting about her advice?

For more on Ms. Bradford’s current needs and submission guidelines, please visit the Bradford Literary Agency.

18 Comments

Filed under Agents, Writing

Agent Laura Bradford’s Tips on Submitting Your Work

Agent Laura Bradford gave a talk entitled “Everything You Want to Know About Literary Agents” at the Valley Center Library in San Diego last Saturday. Here are some of her tips for getting an agent, and what she is looking for in a submission:

  • Do your research. Decide what kind of agent you want. Do you want a teddy bear who will hold your hand through the long process of publication, or a shark who will get you the best deal? Most agents are closer to one end of the spectrum than the other. Once you have a short list, find out about your chosen agents through conferences, organizations like RWA, websites like AAR, blogs, and twitter. QueryTracker has some information, but agents can’t post information so the data can be out of date. Word-of-mouth is another good resource. Books like Writer’s Market are also good sources, but can be out of date by the time they are published.
  • Personalize your submission. She gets from 800-1000 queries per month. If you want to stand out, always personalize your letter. Refer to the type of material the agent is looking for, make sure your genre is one the agent represents, mention attributes of your book similar to an author they represent, say if you’ve met them at a conference. Show that you’ve researched this agent, and say why this agent is the right agent for your book. Personalization and research show a level of care an agent appreciates.
  • What Kills a Submission: Addressing the query letter to the dreaded “Sir/Ms.”, instead of the agent by name. Not checking the agent’s submission policies before sending your material in. Nothing annoys an agent more than getting submissions outside the genres they are selecting for. Many queries Ms. Bradford receives are thrown out because they are for the wrong genre, the word count is wrong, etc. She can’t sell a novel that’s only 20,000 words long.
  • On putting together your submission packet: When writing your query, boil the story down to its essence. Throw out confusing or distracting details. Get rid of any point that might be a red flag. For Ms. Bradford, the point of the  synopsis is to tell the agent where the story goes. She doesn’t care how long it is, but says to check other agents guidelines. Before sending in your sample chapters, have a second set of eyes look over your work — critique partners, beta readers, even a friend who knows grammar, punctuation, and spelling. If you have no one who can help you, she recommends a new site called Book Country. They have an online critiquing forum.
  • Getting Past the Slush Pile: Whether or not she requests a partial is a gut reaction. “Can I sell this? Is it emotional appealing?” This isn’t something the author can know or prepare for. If she likes what she sees, she asks for a partial. If she likes that, she asked for full. Occasionally she requests a revised and resubmit. If she has a problem with the storyline, plot, voice etc. she will write a letter making suggestions to the author. She does not send out a lot of these. If you get a revise and resubmit, she advises that you do not make changes you do not agree with. Use your own judgement.
  • How to submit to Laura Bradford: Check her website for the latest information, but in her talk she said she wants a one-page cover letter with a brief blurb on the story. Keep it concise. She also wants a blurb on the author’s publications and contest wins. It important to include the word count and the genre. In addition, she wants a synopsis, and the first 10 pages.

What do you think? Does personalizing a query help your success rate? How do you research agents?

In my next post I will cover the rest of her talk – her advice on what to do once you get that all-important “call”, what questions to ask a prospective agent, and how she goes about pitching her author’s books to editors. See you next time.

 

20 Comments

Filed under Agents, Writing

My new WordPress Design – And What I Learned from Doing It

As you might have noticed, I recently redesigned my site. I use WordPress, so applying a new template is easy if you know the basics. I added a few additional tricks:

  • cool new header image
  • the ability to subscribe to my blog posts via Feedburner, either as an RSS feed or through email
  • better links to my Facebook and Twitter account

I tend to struggle with WordPress a bit. One of the things I learned while redesigning the site was that many of the problems I thought were WordPress problems are actually issues with my ISP. So I will be changing ISPs sometime soon.

I learned this from managing another WordPress site for a friend, and using another ISP. With that provider I do not have the problems updating my pages that I have with my ISP. I breathed a deep sigh of relief to discover that “it’s not me – it’s them.”

So please let me know what you think of the new site. Like it? Hate it? Any features you’d like to see and don’t? I plan to keep working on the site and start posting more, now that I have a handle on my WordPress problems.

6 Comments

Filed under Writing

Fire Season available from Amazon in A Year in Ink, Vol. 4

Fire Season, an excerpt from my memoir,  is now available from Amazon in A Year in Ink, Vol. 4. It also contains works from forty-one fine writers including fellow SDWI regulars Nicole Vollrath, Charlie Daly, Scott Barbour and Cris Powell.

Fire Season is a story of how losing everything you own can lead to finding your true path. Chapter One, the excerpt in the anthology, starts with the Witch Fire blazing down the hill toward our Rancho Bernardo home while my husband and I sleep unaware in our bed.

I found memoir to have a different set of challenges from fiction – the haziness of memory, the desire for accuracy, the need for sensitivity to others, for starters. And of course there were the intense emotions churned up by writing about our narrow escape from death, and the destruction of our home and everything we owned. I am still working on the full piece – it is hard to dive back into that well of pain for too long at one stretch. More to come.

1 Comment

Filed under Writing

2011 Condor Schedule

I’ll be on the following panels at Condor, San Diego’s own SF and fantasy convention, on February 25-27 at the Town and Country Hotel in Mission Valley. Gregory Benford is the Guest of Honor.

Friday

12 PM. Crescent Room:  “Nobody Knows Anything”:  The unpredictability of the film industry.- Kevin Gerard,  Janet Tait, Lynn Maudlin, Chris Farnsworth

2 PM, Crescent Room: Ebooks and the Future of Publishing – Janet Tait, Richard Dean Starr, Dave Duncan, Jennifer Martin, Jeanne Stein

Sunday

12 PM Ascot Room: Gaming styles:  Putting the role-playing first – William Stoddard, Laura Luchau, Janet Tait, Eben Brooks, Marc Biagi

Check out the complete program schedule. Lots of great guests, including fellow RWASD members Linda Thomas-Sunstrom and Chris Marie Green.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Conventions

Anthology Party – A Year in Ink v. 4, 7:00 P.M. Feb 15

I’m going to be reading an excerpt from my memoir, “Fire Season”, next week at the reception for San Diego Writers Ink. anthology A Year in Ink V.4. I’m a little bit nervous about reading in front of such a large crowd, and but then I’ve done it once before at the Ink Spot, San Diego Writers’ Ink’s home. It’s especially scary because the memoir excerpt I am reading from is the story of the fire that destroyed my house and everything I owned. Reading the short piece brings up a lot of angst for me. But I like a challenge.

The anthology party  is at the Cygnet Theatre in Old Town, San Diego on Tuesday, Feb. 15th at 7 p.m. Fellow gorilla writers Cris Powell and Scott Barbour also have pieces in the anthology.

http://cygnettheatre.com/visit/directions.php

Hope to see you there.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Writing

Notch Up the Tension, Pick up the Pace – A Workshop with Colleen Thompson

Colleen Thompson, RITA- nominated author of Touch of Evil, Beneath Bone Lake, Fatal Error, and Triple Exposure, gave a riveting talk at the April Romance Writers of America-San Diego meeting on building suspense in fiction. Ms. Thompson outlined five techniques to add tension to your novel:

  1. Emphasize polarized (opposite) character traits to heighten conflict. If your heroine is a pacifist, make the hero a warrior. If she’s a control freak, make him a rebel. This works not only for the hero/heroine dynamic, but for your main character and all your secondary characters. Think about how you can tweak your characters to polarize them more. And if you are writing romance, make your hero the “worst guy possible” for your heroine – the guy who makes her want to pull her hair out. Sparks will fly!
  2. Force proximity between/among conflicting characters. Once you have the right dynamic going, if you are writing a romance, make sure your characters stay together. Don’t send one of them off to Tahiti for an extended vacation. How can you keep them together? Here are some ideas: give them a reason to work together – a joint goal. Or put them in competition for that goal. Or have them fight against a common enemy, or fight together for survival. Keeping the hero and heroine together is especially important in romance – it’s hard to pull off a love story if the characters are separated for the first 100 pages.
  3. Figure out how to strengthen the initial conflict. Every character needs to have his own agenda – including the villain – and his own things at risk. Challenge yourself to move past black and white thinking and instead think in shades of gray. Let your characters make bad decisions and give them room to grow. Don’t be afraid to make the initial situation worse, the bad guy badder.
  4. Make a bad situation even worse. Once you get past the beginning and into the middle of the book, you need to up the tension even more. One trick is to shorten the fuse. If the heroine had three days to find a cure for her little sister’s rare disease, find a reason to shorten the time limit to two hours. Another trick is to blow the original goal out of the water. If the heroine’s goal was to find a woman who is a donor match for her sister, have her find the woman, only to have the woman die in her arms. And don’t forget that the middle is another place you can make the bad guy more powerful. There’s nothing like having the hero thinking he’s won, only to discover that the villain has come back, stronger than ever.
  5. Remind the reader of conflict during “breather” scenes. You can’t have nothing but high-tension scenes in your book: the result will be reader fatigue. You need some “breather” scenes as well – scenes where your characters react, reflect, and plan their next actions. But how do you keep your readers engaged in the conflict storyline while in the these scenes? You can use symbolism sprinkled through the scene – for example, if the character just escaped a serial killer, the symbolism of a spider waiting to pounce on his prey will not be lost on the reader. Another technique is to have the characters allude to the conflict through dialog – just a line or two, and in a context that flows naturally in the scene. A technique that may work, depending on the preferences of the editor, is to use an epigraph (relevant quote, phrase, or poem) at the beginning of the scene to keep the conflict in the mind of the reader.

Ms. Thompson’s talk certainly got me thinking about my own novel, and how I could apply these techniques. I found that I naturally use polarized character traits most of the time (regardless of whether the characters are in a romantic relationship), and that the relationships where the characters have polarized traits are the ones that far and away work the best. The ones I am having trouble with are the ones that don’t have polar opposite traits.

How about you? How do you think you could use these techniques in your novel?

3 Comments

Filed under Writing

What Fans Don’t Know About Publishing – A Condor Writing Panel

Saturday’s panel on publishing focused on an inside look at the industry from science fiction and spirtuality writer Matt Pallamary, sf/fantasy writer Jean Graham, graphic novelist Eric Shanower, YA novelist P.J. Haarsma and paranormal romance writer Linda Thomas-Sundstrom.

Some interesting market tidbits were tossed out by the panelists:

  • Romance was 50% of the market last year, this year, so far, it is 56%
  • science fiction is 7.8%
  • Suspense/mystery is not currently selling well
  • Paranormal/dark stuff is selling well
  • YA is selling well
  • An author’s first book published is on-average the 5th book that author has written
  • 70% of books never make back their advances
  • The profit margin on books is between 2-5% (note – I’ve seen this higher – at 7%, by comparison, the profit margin on hospitals is 3.6%, personal computers is 7.5%, and cigarettes is 17.4%) *

The panel discussed the issue of piracy – sites posting free or unauthorized, for sale copies of author’s work. This was characterized as a large problem, but difficult to quantify in terms of how much income authors and publishers are losing due to both illegal sales and potential lost sales due to free copies downloaded by potential customers. It is also frustrating for authors to see people making money illegally from their work, and although the author can issue a takedown notice, these sellers just move to a new email name and start again. The counterpoint opinion was also debated – authors such as Eric Flint and others in the Baen Free Library believe that offering one or two volumes of their early work will encourage readers to buy subsequent volumes. They say readership goes up. This is also difficult to quantify.

Personally I lean toward the Baen Free Library point of view. The Internet makes policing and protecting content impossible, as we’ve seen with the music industry. Giving away all your content, however, doesn’t make sense for authors. It probably doesn’t make sense for anyone, but some content creators, such as musicians, who have live concerts they can charge for, could give away recordings and charge for other aspects of what they do. Not so easy for writers. What the internet has proven to do well is a tiered system of content provision – a small bite of free content for everyone, more content for those who will pay. The Baen Free Library is a nice way to do that. It doesn’t solve the issue of pirates scanning all your books and selling them: if you want to solve that one, you are back to giving away your work for free. Until we build a new economic model that fits the new paradigms of the economy – the speed and ubiquity of Internet, the zero cost of digital files, the value of content, and the disappearing value of the middleman – I don’t think we will solve that problem.

The discussion moved to marketing. P.J. Haarsma mentioned the difficulty of marketing young adult books when the publishers seem to believe that the right people to market to are librarians, parents, and teachers – not kids. “They don’t seem to understand that adults are the very people kids don’t listen to at that age,” Haarsma said. Matt Pallamary recommended pushing your book on podcasts, because they go viral quickly and easily and get the word spread about your book. Eric Shanower mentioned hiring a publicist, and booking ad space in Radio-TV Interview Report. He and Matt Pallamary reported varying return on investment from their ads.

The panel also discussed co-op advertising deals between the publisher and Barnes and Noble (the only large chain left). B&N controls the co-op money from the publisher. The publisher has no control over what books are featured with the co-op advertising money. However, the publisher can pay directly to put an author’s book in an end-cap display.

The discussion on marketing mirrored what I have heard at other conferences: publishers may not do much marketing for writers. What they are able to do isn’t necessarily going to meet every author’s needs. The panel reinforced what many other writers, agents, and editors are saying; if you want your book to succeed, you have to take responsibility for marketing it yourself. That means you have to figure out the target market, decide how to reach them,  develop a plan, and implement it. This doesn’t mean you shouldn’t work with your publisher: you must, of course. Just that you can’t sit back and expect them to do it all for you. Fortunately, we can learn from each other, and panels like this help that process.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Conventions, Writing

What do You Do When Your Characters Don’t Work? – A Condor Writing Panel

Condor – San Diego’s annual science fiction convention, held Feb. 26-28 – hosted a number of writing panels. Leading off Friday at noon, “One of Your Crucial Characters Isn’t Working: What Do You Do?” featured  horror author Tamara Thorne, fantasy author Kevin Gerard, science fiction author Jane Fancher, screenwriter Art Holcomb, and science fiction author Dani Kollin.

The panelists discussed their own work and the challenges they have faced with problematic characters. One of the interesting issues that came up was secondary characters vs. main characters. A panelist pointed out that sometimes the secondary characters are more interesting, both to the writer and to the reader, because they are mysterious. We know a lot about the main character, not so much about the “man in black.” The challenge is creating the same (or ideally higher) level of interest in someone we know much more about.

Another point of discussion: sometimes authors get enamored of one of their characters and feel that this character adds something to the story. But in reality the character is diluting the story, either by taking attention and roles away from other characters or simply by being unnecessary. It can take an outside perspective of a critical reader to point this out if the writer can’t see it for himself. Basically, story trumps character.

Some key points:

“Sometimes your character is in the wrong story. You are trying to make your character do things instead of listening to that.” – Art Holcomb

“What do you want to say? Sometimes people reach a point and stop. You need to keep writing past there.” – Art Holcomb

“Look at your character archetypes. You can see what’s missing, what is duplicated.” – Jane Fancher

Leave a Comment

Filed under Conventions, Writing